No. 19-6720
James Dwayne Myers v. United States
IFP
Tags: criminal-law criminal-procedure divisibility divisibility-analysis eighth-circuit jury-unanimity mathis-standard mathis-v-united-states sentencing-enhancement state-law statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2020-03-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
May a court properly apply the divisibility analysis prescribed in Mathis v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016), without considering the question of jury unanimity?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
May a court properly apply the divisibility analysis prescribed in Mathis v. United States, 136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016), without considering the question of jury unanimity?
Docket Entries
2020-03-30
Petition DENIED.
2020-03-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.
2020-02-21
Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.
2020-01-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 21, 2020.
2020-01-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 22, 2020 to February 21, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-12-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 22, 2020.
2019-12-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 23, 2019 to January 22, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-11-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 23, 2019)
Attorneys
James Myers
Christopher Aaron Holt — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent