No. 19-672
The Rams Football Company, LLC, et al. v. St. Louis Regional Convention and Sports Complex Authority, et al.
Relisted (8)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: arbitrability arbitration-agreement clear-and-unmistakable contract-principles court-enforcement federal-arbitration-act lower-court-split state-contract-law state-law
Latest Conference:
2020-04-17
(distributed 8 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Federal Arbitration Act permits a court to refuse to enforce the terms of an arbitration agreement assigning questions of arbitrability to the arbitrator if those terms would be enforceable under ordinary state-law contract principles in a non-arbitration context.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Federal Arbitration Act permits a court to refuse to enforce the terms of an arbitration agreement assigning questions of arbitrability to the arbitrator if those terms would be enforceable under ordinary state-law contract principles in a non-arbitration context
Docket Entries
2020-04-20
Petition DENIED.
2020-04-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2020.
2020-03-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/3/2020.
2020-03-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.
2020-03-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-03-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/6/2020.
2020-02-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020.
2020-02-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2020-01-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2020-01-08
Reply of petitioners The Rams Football Company, LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2019-12-20
Brief of respondents St. Louis Regional Convention and Sports Complex Authority, et al. in opposition filed.
2019-11-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 26, 2019)
Attorneys
St. Louis Regional Convention and Sports Complex Authority, et al.
James Forrest Bennett — Bowd Bennett LLP, Respondent
The Rams Football Company, LLC, et al.
Paul D. Clement — Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Petitioner