I.) WAe/^er -Ike £/eve/v// CVrcaj*/ erred Ly oLe/vy / tvc^
e-hUoMerk A^/'^ oJiq/Y Far CerAA'c^de dr AppeoJoAl/'d
Aw //?e recori <c/e_ocr AAA f
/Ao-4- reA-fe^A AAAr rrl /v o-. *5><SO^O.'l 'e
F>is^Fi <zjr JAcLyo.
/A/ Ao.C'/
*/Co
allnrocee f/V.
■/ //V /i.ls c^(&im.To.rr M A7t T t © <V<E£/r CU 6^^,oorer 0 60V7cLu.Va^ll
ha~cL Ide<e,/y exfi^^cs/eA /Vv
|D r o e^c. cA (
re-versaj A\/ /Ag. AAe.v e,v/A CAAaV .stW
AAe //V-stAl/A /-/AAroccr icorte c.e cxpp&aL.iS
<2.«5LS
<A -/A^-/ A7'4/edcx/sce.are <s.hi/rO <3k_?rca(
a.) is Ik L 0^ Uabeas, ^ ere a. rerneyCo
/ z: <a/o /I-C^oocA/A Jy^ly 'viola-lfa/s oe^ af
3 V AU £W r;dAc/t<ra| CX./-^ru ;« ^oce
^^eVA/e. A0^r i ^

Is there a remedy when the Habeas corpus proceeding fails to protect a citizen from Double Jeopardy violation because of an incorrect procedural ruling by both the District and appellate courts?