WHERE THEY WERE STANDING P 2HH O NOIH7OIN NI H5L 9NOD2S HI GNTHL80 H0EL SNQD : C2ALMHD SNODLOU OHO2 U.S. C.ONST., AM I AND CONST. 1963 ART. 1$ 15 ?

F. DID JBOPARDY ATTAEH IN MR, JONBS SECOND TRIAL WHON t 2t Ndons Or Ca7arrdm SrM Fne SH THE CAS8 WEC

DED THE PROSECUTIOH WISH TO PROCGED WETH THE SECOND TRIAL?

COURTROOM DURING THE IHITIAL FERST TRIAL PROCBEDINGS?

V DID THE TRIAL COURT ABUSE ITS DISCRETEON ALLOWING AH FNADMISSABLE TESTIMONY AS CLASSIC HEARSAY VIOLATING WUR. JONES EFFBCT#UE RIEHT TO CONFRONTATION AHD CROSS -BXAUENE ALL BVIDENCE GUARANTEBD THRUUGH THE U.S. COMST. AM IL?

Whether the Sixth Circuit erred in affirming the district court's dismissal of petitioner's claims under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments