No. 19-6579
David Lee Smith v. North Carolina, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: access-to-courts civil-procedure civil-rights copyright criminal-procedure due-process habitual-felon habitual-offenders in-forma-pauperis legal-publication punitive-law standing statutory-law
Latest Conference:
2020-03-20
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Are PRO. SE PETITIONERS ENTITLED TO U.S. SUPREME COURT LEAVE TO PROCEED AS PAUPER IN ISSUING COMPLAINT, WHEN CIRCUIT COURT ENTER DKILY FX) FRIVOLOUS ISSUES AND STRIPPED HIS PAUPER STATUS?
IS CLASS OF M. D. BELLARED HABITUAL FELONS ENTITLED TO INJUNCTIVE RELIEF FROM PENAL AND PUNATIVE DAMAGES, IF M.E. STATE LEGAL AUTHORITIES PUBLISHING UNLAWFULLY PRINTED INTO CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS MANUALS, INCORRECTLY STATING AGE, AND TO LOOK A YEAR IN 1996 THROUGH XCMT?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Are pro-se petitioners entitled to Supreme Court leave to proceed as pauper in 55/983 complaint, when circuit court cited only (2) frivolous dismissals and stripped his pauper status?
Docket Entries
2020-03-23
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-02-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2020.
2020-01-21
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2020-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.
2019-11-22
Waiver of right of respondent State of North Carolina to respond filed.
2019-10-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 13, 2019)
Attorneys
David Lee Smith
David L. Smith — Petitioner
State of North Carolina
Daniel Patrick O'Brien — NC Department of Justice, Respondent