No. 19-6547
Kevin Sterling v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: affirmance appeal appointed-counsel cja-18-usc-3006 criminal-justice-act criminal-procedure due-process fed-r-crim-p-44 federal-rules-criminal-procedure gideon-v-wainwright inability-to-pay legal-representation right-to-counsel writ-of-certiorari
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether defendant should have been appointed counsel too
assist him in filing a writ of Certiorari, pursuant to the CJA
18 U,S.C, § 3006.. . and FED, R, Crim, P, 44, where after
affirmance <5£ defendant's appeal •, retained counsel stop representing
pay:. J And this was in violation defendant due to his inability to
of DdhertySv;.tUnitedPStatbs , 404 U,S, 28-29 ( 1971 )
Whether based on the facts of this case this court should
Appoint Counsel to assist in seeking review for Certiorari
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether defendant should have been appointed counsel
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-18
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-07-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 9, 2019)
Attorneys
Kevin Sterling
Kevin Sterling — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent