QUESTION ONE:
Is a 28 USC SEC. 2255 MOTION premature if filed less than 90 days after the
appellate court enters its judgment in accordance with the holdings in Clay v.
United States, NO. 01*1500> showing no extraordinary circumstances and in
violation of the Final Judgment Rule?

QUESTION TWO:
Does the indictment filed in this defendant 's case, state a violation of federal law
when it only alleges, in respect to Grant, that Grant ratifietfprescriptions forged by
his alleged co-conspirator who successfully submitted them for payment without a
'manifestation of Assent to an illegal contract, the fact issues that comprise the
theory of ratification were not explained to the jury?

Is a 28 USC SEC. 2255 MOTION premature if filed less than 90 days after the appellate court enters its judgment in accordance with the holdings in Clay v. United States, NO. 01-1500; showing no extraordinary circumstances and in violation of the Final Judgment Rule?