No. 19-6515
Andre Verlin Anderson v. Vicki Janssen, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-due-process-eyewitness-identifi criminal-procedure-habeas-corpus-certificate-of-ap Did the district court commit reversible error whe Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Eig due-process eyewitness-identification habeas-corpus motion-to-suppress photographic-lineup reversible-error
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION ONE:
Did the district court commit reversible error by denying Petitioner's motion to suppress the unduly suggestive photographic lineup?
QUESTION TWO:
Did the district court commit reversible error when it prohibited Petitioner's expert on eyewitness identification from testifying at trial?
QUESTION THREE:
Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit commit reversible error in denying Petitioner's application for certificate of appealability?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the district court commit reversible error by denying Petitioner's motion to suppress the unduly suggestive photographic lineup?
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-13
Waiver of right of respondent Vicki Janssen to respond filed.
2019-10-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 6, 2019)
Attorneys
Andre V. Anderson
Andre Verlin Anderson — Petitioner
Vicki Janssen
Nick David Campanario — St. Louis County Attorney's Office, Respondent