No. 19-6511
Roberto Trinidad Del Carpio Frescas v. United States
Tags: criminal-procedure fifth-circuit mandatory-victims-restitution-act preponderance-of-evidence preponderance-of-the-evidence reliable-evidence restitution restitution-standard sentencing
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether this Court should clarify what "reliable evidence" means for establishing, by a preponderance of the evidence, the amount of restitution under the Mandatory Victim's Restitution Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3663A.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
What is the meaning of 'reliable evidence' for establishing the amount of restitution under the Mandatory Victim's Restitution Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3663A?
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-10-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 9, 2019)
Attorneys
Roberto Trinidad Del Carpio Frescas
Judy Fulmer Madewell — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent