Were Colorado's UCCJEA requirements detailed enough to defeat qualified immunity in a Fourth Amendment claim arising from the denial of a post-seizure hearing or, in the alternative, was the right to a post-removal hearing identified in decisional law with obvious clarity?

Did the Colorado district court have specific jurisdiction over Kansas agents who had direct and significant contact with Colorado agents in obtaining immediate legal custody of children while the children were located in Colorado?

Were Colorado's UCCJEA requirements detailed enough to defeat qualified immunity in a Fourth Amendment claim arising from the denial of a post-seizure hearing or, in the alternative, was the right to a post-removal hearing identified in decisional law with obvious clarity?