No. 19-6486
Eduard Bangiyev v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-1963 21-usc-853 co-conspirator-liability conspiracy criminal-forfeiture federal-statute personal-possession-or-use proceeds-of-crime property-forfeiture statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent united-states-v-honeycutt
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the elements that availed the Supreme court decision in United States v. Honeycutt, also apply more broadly to the 18 U.S.C.S. 1963 statute.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the elements that availed the Supreme court decision in United States v. Honeycutt also apply more broadly to the 18 U.S.C.S. 1963 statute
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-08-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 4, 2019)
Attorneys
Eduard Bangiyev
Eduard Bangiyev — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent