No. 19-6471
Diego Alonso Lozano-Perez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-determination constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process federal-rules federal-rules-of-criminal-procedure guilty-plea plea-bargaining rule-11 standing voluntariness voluntary-plea
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Court made the Constitutionally required determination that the guilty plea was truly voluntary, whereas it failed to comply with the rigid observance of Rule 11 of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, by merely making vague references to the record.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court made the Constitutionally required determination that the guilty plea was truly voluntary
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-10-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due December 2, 2019)
Attorneys
Diego Lozano-Perez
Diego Alonso Lozano-Perez — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent