1. Whether the Texas district court violated the Petitioner 's Federal Civil Rights
under Section 1983 by discriminating against the Petitioner 's Religious Freedom and
violating the Petitioner 's Constitutional Religious Freedoms. Did the court violate the
First Amendment, the Texas Constitution and equal protection clause under the
Fourteenth Amendment regarding Civil Right since they terminated the Petitioners
Parental Rights due to her religion. Does the state have a right to terminate parental
rights for one reason, the parents are Christians? Does this violate the Federal
Constitutionally protected rights of freedom of religion to raise children in the religion
of Christianity without the fear of government interference? Did the government
overstep its boundaries when it terminated parental rights due to religious beliefs?

2. Whether the Texas district court violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
The State of Texas violated the Petitioner 's rights by prohibiting her free exercise of
religion. This court must review this case to restore the compelling interest test as set
forth in Sherbert v. Vemer, 374 U.S. 398 (1963) and Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S.
205 (1972) and to guarantee its application in all cases where free exercise of religion
is substantially burdened; and (2) to provide a claim or defense to persons whose
religious exercise is substantially burdened by government. This is an ongoing debate
now as there is a current case now at the Supreme Court level trying to overturn the
RFRA in the United States Supreme Court in October of 2019.

3. Did the state violate the petitioner 's due process rights by committing fraud on the
court by suppressing evidence to the district court and appeals court so her children
would not be returned to Oklahoma?

4. Whether the Texas district court erred in terminating the parental rights of
Oklahoma residents, without the permission of the state of Oklahoma. In violation of
the UCCJEA law, violating Federal Jurisdictional issues where two separate states
Oklahoma and Texas have argued over jurisdiction. Whether the district court erred
by violating the Petitioner 's Constitutional Fourteenth Due Process Right, a Federal
right, by denying her the right to have her case heard in Oklahoma where the judge
was going to return custody of her children to her.

5. Whether the Texas district court violated the Federal law in regard to ICWA, (Indian
Child Welfare Act) by refusing to contact the Native American Nation. Is the new
order denying the Cherokee tribe 's motion to dismiss overturning ICWA and effects
this case at par.

6. Whether the Texas district court violated the Petitioner 's due process rights according
to the Fourteenth Amendment terminating the parents ' rights due to homeschooling.
Did the court violate the parents ' first amendment religious freedom by terminating
parental rights due to homeschooling for religious reasons, in conflict with the United
States case Yoder vs. Wisconsin 406 U.S. 205. Did the court violate the Texas law
that made it illegal on May 7,2019 to terminate parental rights due to homeschooling?
Did the state violate the Due Process Clause by denying court-appointed counsel to
an indigent pro-se parent facing termination of her parental rights without applying the
due process analysis mandated by the Court in Lass

Whether the Texas district court violated the Petitioner's Federal Civil Rights