DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AS TO WHETHER THE
DISTRICT COURT;
(1) ERRS DENYING WILSON'S HABEAS CLAIM(S) ALLEGING COUNSEL'S
UNREASONABLE FAILURE TO INVESTIGATE LAW & MISADVICE
THEREBY RENDERING HIS PLEA UNKNOWINGLY AND
UNINTELLIGENTLY ENTERED, & FURTHER;
(2) ABUSES ITS' DISCRETION DENYING AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING
DESPITE NUMEROUS AFFIDAVITS PRESENTED ALLEGING FACTS
OUTSIDE THE RECORD REGARDING THE PRECEDING CLAIM.

DOES THE FOURTH CIRCUIT'S DECISION CONTRAVENE SUPREME COURT
PRECEDENT GOVERNING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AS WELL AS
AUTHORITY ENFORCING CONSTITUTIONAL RESTRAINTS ON THE COMMERCE
CLAUSE'S REACH?

Whether the district court erred in denying Wilson's habeas claim alleging counsel's unreasonable failure to investigate law and misadvice, thereby rendering his plea unknowingly and unintelligently entered, and abused its discretion in denying an evidentiary hearing despite numerous affidavits alleging facts outside the record