No. 19-6397
Jose Gomez-Aguilar v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: aggravated-felony categorical-approach court-of-appeals criminal-law due-process federal-jurisdiction immigration immigration-law statutory-interpretation theft-offense
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the court of appeals err in holding that robbery in violation of D.C. Code § 22-2801 categorically qualifies as an aggravated felony theft offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(G)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the court of appeals err in holding that robbery in violation of D.C. Code § 22-2801 categorically qualifies as an aggravated felony theft offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(48)(G)?
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-10-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 25, 2019)
Attorneys
Jose Gomez-Aguilar
Daniel Lee Kaplan — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent