No. 19-6392
Jeffrey F. Evers v. Brian Foster, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals civil-procedure civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process federal-courts first-amendment free-exercise habeas-corpus merits-based-decision new-trial procedural-default public-accommodation religious-freedom same-sex-marriage standing state-licensing
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
me issues responding to a no-merit repart that doesint
sion with respect of allclaims raised by Evers'
ere was never a weapon pruduce.
the Sixth Amendment under the confrontation rights.
complainant to not be properly crossexa
t
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does federal law under A952(c) permit a civil justice system to respond to a No-Merits review of a procedural default that can only be waived as a merits-based decision to respect all claims raised that were never decided?
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-05
Waiver of right of respondent Brian Foster to respond filed.
2019-07-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 25, 2019)
Attorneys
Brian Foster
Christine A. Remington — Respondent
Jeffrey F. Evers
Jeffrey F. Evers — Petitioner