No. 19-6375
Giam Nguyen, Anna Bagoumian, and Donovan Simmons v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: compulsory-process deliberate-ignorance due-process harmless-error jury-instructions medicare-fraud reverse-404(b) reverse-404b-evidence
Latest Conference:
2019-11-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the Petitioners were deprived of their Fifth Amendment right of Due Process to present a defense by the District Court's exclusion of the reverse 404(b) evidence.
2. Whether the Petitioners were deprived of their Sixth Amendment right of compulsory process by the District Court's exclusion of the reverse 404(b) evidence.
3. Did the Court of Appeals use the correct standard to determine harmless error or should it have used the standard set out in FED. R. CRIM. P. 52(a) after it deems a jury instruction confusing.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioners were deprived of their Fifth Amendment right of due process to present a defense
Docket Entries
2019-11-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2019.
2019-10-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-10-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 25, 2019)
Attorneys
Giam Nguyen, et al.
Stanley G. Schneider — Schneider & McKinney, P.C., Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent