No. 19-6368

Richard Kalinowski v. Illinois

Lower Court: Illinois
Docketed: 2019-10-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-commitment civil-rights constitutional-review due-process liberty liberty-interest pre-trial-detention speedy-trial standard-of-review
Latest Conference: 2019-11-22
Question Presented (from Petition)

I. Does the right to a speedy trial in a civil commitment case, require the Courts to apply a more strict standard of review, due to the loss of liberty involved?

II. Does due process under the United States Constitution, Amend ment XIV, §1., require automatic review on at least an annual basis, without action of the committed individual, for con tinued confinement cases involving civilly committed sexual offenders, who are pre-trial detainees, and who have not been adjudicated guilty of any crime?

III. Does due process under the United States Constitution, Amend ment VI, right to a speedy trial; require that the Court in which such right is asserted, assume responsibility to ensure that the person who has asserted the right, is granted the right?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the right to a speedy trial in a civil commitment case require the Courts to apply a more strict standard of review due to the loss of liberty involved?

Docket Entries

2019-11-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2019.
2019-10-30
Waiver of right of respondent Illinois to respond filed.
2019-10-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 22, 2019)
2019-08-31
Application (19A245) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until October 19, 2019.
2019-08-09
Application (19A245) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 20, 2019 to October 19, 2019, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.

Attorneys

Illinois
Michael Marc Glick — Respondent
Richard Kalinowski
Richard A. Kalinowski — Petitioner