No. 19-6367
James Eugene Keiser v. Ricky Foxwell, Warden, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2253 certificate-of-appealability civil-procedure constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment standing trial-errors
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the 4th Circuit exceeded the limited scope of the
COA analysis which was an error, albeit Petitioner met the
requirement showing of denial of a constitutional right and under
28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(2)?
2. Whether Petitioner was denied his Sixth Amendment right to
effective assistance of counsel when his attorney permitted him to
be tried in prison clothes, in spite of the state trial court
warnings?
3. Whether Petitioner was denied his Sixth Amendment right to
effective assistance of counsel when his attorney impeached him
with inadmissible prior convictions which prejudiced the defense?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the 4th Circuit exceeded the limited scope of the COA analysis
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-04
Waiver of right of respondents Ricky Foxwell, et al. to respond filed.
2019-10-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 22, 2019)
Attorneys
James Keiser
James Eugene Keiser — Petitioner
Ricky Foxwell, et al.
Carrie J. Williams — Respondent