No. 19-6356
Gary E. Larock, Jr. v. United States
Tags: constitutional-rights fourth-amendment fourth-amendment,due-process,civil-rights,liberty, home-search liberty-deprivation liberty-interest overbreadth probation probation-supervision statutory-reasonableness vagueness warrantless-search
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment
FourthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2019-11-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether this Court should grant review to consider whether a condition of supervision requiring the Petitioner to permit a probation officer to visit her at any time at home or elsewhere is unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment, constitutionally overbroad and vague, statutorily unreasonable, and a greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a condition of supervision requiring the Petitioner to permit a probation officer to visit at any time is unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment, constitutionally overbroad and vague, statutorily unreasonable, and a greater deprivation of liberty than necessary
Docket Entries
2019-11-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2019.
2019-10-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-10-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 22, 2019)
Attorneys
Gary E. Larock, Jr.
Christopher A. Curtis — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent