No. 19-6355
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (5)IFP
Tags: crime-of-violence due-process eleventh-circuit habeas-corpus liberty-interest precedential-effect prior-panel-precedent pro-se-petition section-2255 successive-petitions
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-06-04
(distributed 5 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a defendant's right to Due Process in his initial § 2255 proceeding is violated by the Eleventh Circuit's rule assigning precedential effect to an order denying a pro se petitioner's application for authorization to file a second or successive § 2255 motion.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a defendant's right to Due Process in his initial § 2255 proceeding is violated by the Eleventh Circuit's rule assigning precedential effect to an order denying a pro se petitioner's application for authorization to file a second or successive § 2255 motion
Docket Entries
2020-06-08
Petition DENIED. Justice Sotomayor, respecting the denial of certiorari: I concur for the reasons set out in <i>St. Hubert</i> v. <i>United States</i>, 590 U. S. ___ (2020) (Statement of Justice Sotomayor respecting the denial of certiorari).
2020-06-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.
2020-05-26
Rescheduled.
2020-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.
2020-05-19
Rescheduled.
2020-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.
2020-05-12
Rescheduled.
2020-04-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.
2020-04-23
Reply of petitioner Eric Mack filed. (Distributed)
2020-04-10
Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.
2020-03-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 13, 2020.
2020-03-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 13, 2020 to April 13, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-01-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 13, 2020.
2020-01-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 13, 2020 to March 13, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-12-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 13, 2020.
2019-12-04
Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 12, 2019 to January 13, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-11-12
Response Requested. (Due December 12, 2019)
2019-11-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2019.
2019-10-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-10-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 22, 2019)
2019-08-15
Application (19A154) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until October 19, 2019.
2019-08-09
Application (19A154) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 20, 2019 to October 19, 2019, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Eric Mack
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent