Does United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 126 S.Ct. 2557, 165 L.Ed.2d 409 (2006) abrogate Flanagan v. United States, 465 U.S. 259 (1984) and permit interlocutory appellate review of the denial of counsel of a defendant's choice pursuant to the Collateral Order Doctrine?

Does an appellate court have jurisdiction pursuant to the Collateral Order Doctrine to review an order denying a request for a continuance as a reasonable accommodation for a disability when such denial of continuance results in defendant not being represented by counsel of his choosing?

Is a defendant entitled to a reasonable accommodation for the disability of his counsel?

Does United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez abrogate Flanagan v. United States and permit interlocutory appellate review of the denial of counsel of a defendant's choice?