1.) DID THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, AND SUBSEQUENTLY THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, VIOLATE THE PETITIONER'S FIFTH AMENDMENT RIGHT, UNDER THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, TO DUE PROCESS OF LAW, WHEN IT ACCEPTED A JURY'S VERDICT OF GUILTY, FOR AN OFFENSE UNDER TITLE 18 UNITED STATES CODE SERVICE, CHAPTER 117, SECTION 2422, SUBSECTION (b), WHERE AN ELEMENT REQUIRED IN OTHER CIRCUITS FOR A CONVICTION WAS NEITHER PROVEN NOR PLEAD TO?

2.) DID THE DECISION, ISSUED BY THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, CONFLICT WITH THE DECISIONS ENTERED IN OTHER COURTS OF APPEALS ACROSS THE COUNRTY , WARRANTING CLARIFICATION BY THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES AS TO WHAT CONDUCT IS PROSCRIBED UNDER TITLE 18 UNITED STATES CODE SERVICE, CHAPTER 117, SECTION 2422, SUBSECTION (b)?

Did the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida and the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit violate the petitioner's Fifth Amendment right to due process of law?