Is the widespread fabrication and destruction of false DNA evidence by a government chemist for use at trial against U.S. servicemembers, and the failure of an Article I military court to reopen a conviction following the post-trial discovery of the chemist's misconduct, consistent with this Court's holdings in Mesarosh v. United States and Giglio v. United States, recognizing the principle that post-trial information can so discredit the credibility of a principal government witness that it undermines the integrity of the judicial process?

Is the widespread fabrication and destruction of false DNA evidence by a government chemist for use at trial against U.S. servicemembers, and the failure of an Article I military court to reopen a conviction following the post-trial discovery of the chemist's misconduct, consistent with this Court's holdings in Mesarosh v. United States and Giglio v. United States?