Did the Ninth Circuit's disposition of Petitioner's Faretta claim, which permitted the district court to deny it after determining that Petitioner had asserted it solely for dilatory purposes, conflict not only with Faretta itself, which had not enumerated that exception, but also opinions from at least one of its sister federal court of appeals and several state supreme courts?

Did the Ninth Circuit's disposition of Petitioner's Faretta claim conflict with Faretta v. California?