Was the Petitioner restored Prior to the November 2009 Trial ?#1

Was the Petitioners Due Process of Law violated by being Tried in Noveirber 2009, while legally incoirpetent ?#2

#3 Did the District Court ERROR in using a false premise that Petitioner was restored in 2005 in their 2011 Doc 427 Conclusion of,competent to proceed ?

#4 Did the District Court ERROR in declining a retroactive competency determination regarding petitioners conpetency to have stood trial in Doc 427,page 10 ?

#5 Did the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit ERROR in the denial of the Petitioners Direct Appeal 11-3717, 12-2707 on June 21st 2013, see page 10 and 11,using false preirise that petitioner was restored in 2005 ?

#6 Does the U.S.Supreme Court need to decide the questions, for National Importance as both the lower courts decisions were erroneous,when the record shows contrary ?

Was the Petitioner restored prior to the November 2009 trial?