No. 19-6254

Christopher T. Shanahan v. Idaho

Lower Court: Idaho
Docketed: 2019-10-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 8th-amendment constitutional-law cruel-and-unusual-punishment eighth-amendment equal-protection juvenile-sentencing life-sentence mitigating-factors parole parole-eligibility
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment
Latest Conference: 2019-11-15
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Does a juvenile life sentence, with parole eligibility after a lengthy term for years, in a state with no guarantee that the mitigating qualities of youth will ever be considered violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment?

2. Must a Court reviewing an Eighth Amendment challenge to a juvenile offender's adult prison sentence consider and assess the mitigating qualities of youth as a constitutional requirement?

3. Does a State violate equal protection of the law under the Fourteenth Amendment when it grants some juvenile offenders an opportunity to be resentenced but denies that same opportunity to other juvenile offenders who are within the same class?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a juvenile life sentence with parole eligibility after a lengthy term violate the Eighth Amendment?

Docket Entries

2019-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-10-23
Waiver of right of respondent Idaho to respond filed.
2019-10-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 12, 2019)

Attorneys

Christopher Shanahan
Craig Harrison DurhamFerguson/Durham, PLLC, Petitioner
Idaho
Kenneth K. JorgensenOff of Attny Gen - State of ID, Respondent