Concealed impeaching evidence, 1" In Light oF ihe neuuly discovered Fraudulently exposing many Suborn Fraudulent" testimon admithd that Jurors wouldhave Voted IJ0T6UlLT)f. . .See Claim 2.. page 7iy by principle U i loess , even prosecutors JL -/do doubt, trial Judge Would have granted the Motion to slrit/e , In Light oF ihe necu evidence , f roving the motion ms deniedLy Extrinsic Fraud.. See Claim 1 page 2

3~ Hem evidence proves that Constitutional Violations has resulted in the Conviction oF this Petitioner U)ho is actually innocent .« See Claim 10 page 9

H'The State Fraudulently Concealed that their principle witness is Labeled by Habitual Liar .

5'7he State Fraudulently Concealed many Impeaching evidence proving Fraudulent Conviction oF actually innocent Petitioner.* Set Claims l,l,3(#7 pages s$6

de their principle Witness present Suborn Fraudulent testimony d Fraudulently Concealed bis promise oF Leniency .. See Claims '1,5,6^2 pages 5,1

l" The State deprived petitioner aF his Valuable right to his one Full round oF Federal habeas cevieuf by Extri

&- UccofJing "h> all JUSTICES/ Denying IK is Petition is a Miscarriage oF Justice *. page loIt or Fa I IF Court (ft Police as a See Claim 1 ... Page S -e m

i-The Si.it Ma

Whether newly discovered evidence of fraudulently concealed impeaching evidence and constitutional violations warrants reversal of petitioner's conviction