No. 19-6248

In Re Warren Parks

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2019-10-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: appeal civil-procedure constitutional-rights court-procedure due-process federal-rules federal-rules-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure sanction-hearing sanctions standing subject-matter-jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2020-02-21 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Sanction procedural Prerequisite of F.R.C.P. Federal Rules Civil Procedure, the order of July 05" 2017, NO. 17-2342, William J. Bauer, Richard A. Posner, David F. Hamilton of the United States Court Appeals, For Seventh Circuit, Chicago llinois, The Sanction Impose did it comply with Federal Rules Civil Procedure.

2. The Question for the Court does the recorded points to the fact that Parks was serve a motion for sanction and was there a hearing and Parks had the opportunity to be heard, before sanction was impose on July 5'* 2017.

3. Does the sanction impose meet the requirements in Federal Rules Civil Procedure, Rule 11 and see Stein vs Ulster, 127 f 3d. 292.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the sanction imposed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit complied with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Docket Entries

2020-02-24
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-01-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2019-12-25
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-12-16
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2019.
2019-08-30
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 12, 2019)

Attorneys

Warren In Re Parks
Warren Parks — Petitioner