1. Whether state law that interferes with and conflicts with the Federal Bank Robbery Act and Federal Stat18 USCS § 2113, that was intended to ue comprehensively state offenses committedagainst a National or Federal bank.

2. Does the State of Wisconsin possess criminal jurisdiction of bank Guaranty Bank which is a Federal Savings Bank, and is not amongst the financial institutions defined pursuant to Wis. Stat. §943.80 (2) for crimes under §943.81-943.90 or any other felony committed against a financial institution to include robbery of a financial institution pursuant torobbery of Wisconsin State Statue 943.87?

3. Does the State of Wisconsin have to adhere to and yield to the laws of the United States and the United Statconstitution whereas the Bank es i.

4. Robbery Act and Federal Statue 18 USCS. § 2113 comprehensively gives jurisdiction of National and Federal banks to the United States?

5. Since the State of Wisconsin laws interfere, and are in conflict of paramount sin be preempted to prosecute and federal law, would the State of Wiscon cn avict for a crime of bank robbery against a federal bank.

6. I' the laws of the United States are the Supreme law of the land pursuant ti the Supremacy Clause of the United States Const. Art. VI Cl. 2, by what si ithority does the State of Wisconsin have preemptive power over the L ws of the United States in regards to bank robberies of a Federal bank

7. ( an a defendant be convicted upon a permitted withdrawn Alford Plea in defendants desires to reinstate thei, ly state or federal court against the \ ithdrawn plea

8. Does the conviction by a jurisdiction whom lacks legal jurisdictionviolate the defendants due process rights within the meaning of the 14*. amendment of the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution

9. Is it aviolation of the 8* amendment cruel and unusual punishment fora conviction of one which they 're both substantively and procedurally innocent

10. Would a conviction pronounced by a court that lacks legal authority but assumes jurisdiction by want of jurisdiction be void ad inito

Whether state law interferes with and conflicts with the Federal Bank Robbery Act and Federal Statute 18 USCS § 2113