IS a Family Law Divorce Proceeding in which Parental, Custody Property and Financial rights are at issue a Bona Fide Civil Access to Courts Action warranting Asteo Bounds ~ Omith (1977430 0s 817; Silva 0 Divitton0, 658 F3d 1090 qthCr 2011; Snyder v Nolan, 38o F3d 279 7thCr 2002).

Does Court Clerks, who w.llfilly refise/fail to file submitted Pro Se' litqart document fail to Send Pro So litiqants Orders of th'e Cowt iNmunity from 1983 Action? Antoine v Byers (1993) 508 US429 Harlow v Fi+2erald (198z) 457 US 8oo; Silva. Supra; Snde, Supra).

Can this Appellart Action which Declaratory/ Prospective/ Injunction Souant refisal to fle F2 sulmctted on the Pro be Litaant documerts be held a "Stike 11 State AClain" puo "Failure To Under Section 1915? Pullam v Ailen, (1984) 466 W3 522).

Did Pottioner properly derial Plead Q of Equal Protection claim Cout the 1n Pro Se refusal to file submitted documents, failure to send Ordors litiqant of the Cowt and refi sal ot belf Help 5e Facilitator to help "incarcerated"Pro Cleburge help?Clelourne v litiqants US 432) Living ctr (1985) 473

Whether incarcerated pro se litigants' custody, parental rights, property, and financial matters are at issue in a bona fide civil action seeking access to courts