.WhEthER fectiv ASisA of COUE ws h WhE cOU AppoNd cOUe ft
CRMN RACICE to peSUE rNSURAUCE lAW the MIdle of y MEl. whCh cAUSE y AEAl to
bE disMissEd "du o pOcEdUl EROR.
Wot t cd j i di or ps to te
About prioe Relatiauships ad beng able to qive a mubias dud fair ed tel to the detudu?
whth s ticl at of whe the pascte a And ed pejed
tstinoy f the ises h he poece s pequih
WEtE Eupaty Ed tA y Ay CAh EMp Ad E by hEM,
Amay dam the deteke fas ou the RespwAbility of the comealth twy?
WhthER a WhETEquEStd b MN o DiERy AExCAtRy vId s to b Aed
U s AcE Ad s s K AAiAbe AD piECE Ad witE hECAuE Cl
ELCUpAtORy EVIDErCE wASCt SpECiFICOlly AsSKEd fOR.
WEER i AUE SO AE WEe WA wA AAR JR
couflict wtified the crweath (byltte of couflict but. reply tht he didit plu ou doig
a E o My
WET WE AID R CN MA AA y AN A h
i g h A u to
Kuow thE dEfENdANt?
sustaied by the cout iustcius to qie o weight to tht testimuy duru delibeios
WAS MEVER CRELED bU thE COURt?
W y C C
EVIDEE o pEt tO thER pENg ChaGE on pEA dES UCg HE tSO
questious

Whether the U.S. District Court abused its discretion in dismissing the case, in violation of the petitioners' civil-rights, due-process, and free-speech rights