I. IF A STATES AIDING AND ABETTING STATUTE IS BROADER
THAN THE FEDERAL GENERIC DEFINITION; DOES AIDING
AND ABETTING AGGRAVATED ROBBERY QUALIFY AS A PREDICATE
OFFENSE UNDER,THE?A.C.C.A. IN THAT STATE?

II. DOES MINNESOTANS AGGRAVATED ROBBERY STATUTE -WHICH ALLOWS
COVICTIONS FOR SUDDEN SNATCHING- STILL QUALIFY AS AN
A.C.C.A. PREDICATE AFTER THE SUPREME COURTS DECISION
IN STOKELING ?

III. IF A STATUTE ON ITS FACE IS OVERBROAD, CAN THE COURT
LOOK BEYOND THE STATUTE OF CONVICTION TO A LESSER j.
INCLUDED OFFENSE OF A LESSER INCLUDED OFFENSE TO DETERMINE
THAT THE OVERBROAD STATUTE NOW QUALIFIES ?

Whether a state's aiding and abetting statute that is broader than the federal generic definition can qualify as a predicate offense under the ACCA