No. 19-6225

Marc Pierre Hall v. Warden Andrews

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-10-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2255 district-court fundamental-errors habeas-corpus judicial-review precedent-analysis retroactive-statutory-interpretation savings-clause-28-usc-2241 statutory-interpretation statutory-interpretation-28-usc-2255 subject-matter-jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2019-11-08
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Petitioner respectfully requests the Supreme Court's Supervision of uncommunicated Circuit Courts regarding Statutory Interpretation and application of 28 USC 2255 - Savings Clause [28 USC 2244] writ of habeas Corpus regarding fundamental errors and retroactive statutory interpretive lauds and codkethe- Petitioner's Case oncets this Court's requirements.

2. Petitioner respectfully requests the Supreme Court Supervision and invoke a (GRV- Grand remand decree) for the District Court on the question of Whether Subject matter Jurisdiction Was Proper in light of United States v. Cotton, 535 US 25 (2003); Bailey v. United States, 511 US 134 (2003); Jones v. United States, 529 US 848 (2000), based on the records of the case.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the district court had proper subject matter jurisdiction in light of United States v. Cotton, 535 U.S. 625 (2002), Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137 (1995), and Jones v. United States, 529 U.S. 848 (2000)

Docket Entries

2019-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-10-16
Waiver of right of respondent Warden Andrews to respond filed.
2019-09-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 8, 2019)

Attorneys

Marc Pierre Hall
Marc Pierre Hall — Petitioner
Warden Andrews
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent