No. 19-6224
Philong Huynh v. Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law appellate-review attorney-fees civil-procedure civil-rights congressional-statutes court-procedure discretionary-function discretionary-function-exception discretionary-standard due-process government-oversight investigation-power judicial-review legal-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-11-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
If government oversight function, including the power of investigation, is a way of carrying laws into effect (1 Am J 2d Adm L's 81), then is that power or duty to investigate as set out by congressional statutes subject to the discretionary function exception?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the government oversight function, including the power of investigation, is subject to the discretionary function exception under congressional statutes
Docket Entries
2019-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-10-18
Waiver of right of respondent Brennan, Magan J. to respond filed.
2019-09-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 8, 2019)
Attorneys
Brennan, Magan J.
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Philong Huynh
Philong Huynh — Petitioner