No. 19-6211
Barry L. Clark v. Mark Gwyn, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: academic-studies civil-rights constitutional-review due-process judicial-precedent landmark-decisions legislative-intent recidivism sex-offender sex-offenders standing state-sponsored-surveys
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-11-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is it proper and timely for this Supreme Court to give redress to pronouncements incorporated within earlier landmark decisions stating that recidivism of sex offenders is "lightening and high " (an admonition Tennessee legislators relied upon in crafting Tennessee law) after multiple academic studies and state sponsored surveys determined those earlier pronouncements to be erroneous??
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is it proper and timely for this Supreme Court to give redress to pronouncements incorporated within earlier landmark decisions stating that recidivism of sex offenders is 'frightening and high,' after multiple academic studies and state sponsored surveys determined those earlier pronouncements to be erroneous?
Docket Entries
2019-11-18
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/15/2019.
2019-10-23
Waiver of right of respondents Mark Gwyn, et al. to respond filed.
2019-10-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 7, 2019)
Attorneys
Barry L. Clark
Barry L. Clark — Petitioner
Mark Gwyn, et al.
Scott Crawford Sutherland — Tennessee Attorney General's Office, Respondent