No. 19-6210
Marcus Jackson v. Noah Nagy, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-standard case-by-case case-by-case-analysis circuit-split civil-procedure factual-circumstances federal-procedure judicial-review reasonable-time rule-60(b)(6) rule-60b6
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER THIS COURT SHOULD ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI IN ORDER TO RESOLVE
A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE SIXTH, FIFTH AND NINTH CIRCUITS ON WHAT IS THE
APPROPRIATE APPLICATION OF RULE 60(B)(6), REASONABLE TIME ANALYSES
WHERE THE SIXTH CIRCUIT REVIEW DO NOT REQUIRE A FULL ANALYSIS OF THE
FACTUAL CIRCUMSTANCES OF EACH CASE, YET A FULL CASE BY CASE INQUIRY
OF THE FACTS OF EACH CASE IS REQUIRED BY THE FIFTH AND NINTH CIRCUITS.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the appropriate application of Rule 60(b)(6) requires a full case-by-case analysis of the factual circumstances, or whether a less stringent review is permissible
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-11-07
Waiver of right of respondent Noah Nagy, Warden to respond filed.
2019-08-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 7, 2019)
Attorneys
Marcus Jackson
Marcus Jackson — Petitioner
Noah Nagy, Warden
Fadwa A. Hammoud — Michigan Department of Attorney General, Respondent