No. 19-6208
Darrell Alan Lussier v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 2255-motion appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability court-of-appeals district-court due-process established-precedent habeas-corpus habeas-corpus-appeal judicial-precedent precedent right-to-appeal section-2255
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-11-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
1.) When a District Court's denial of a §2255 motion is contrary
to established precedent is the Court of Appeals required to
grant a certificate of appealability?
2.) Does a defendant's constitutional right to be present extend
to an in camera hearing where the U-S- Attorney, defense
counsel, and the judge discuss what the judge will accept
in a contemplated plea agreement?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When a District Court's denial of a §2255 motion is contrary to established precedent, is the Court of Appeals required to grant a certificate of appealability?
Docket Entries
2019-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-10-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-08-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 7, 2019)
Attorneys
Darrell Lussier
Darrell Alan Lussier — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent