No. 19-6189
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion civil-procedure clear-error due-process judicial-bias judicial-discretion judicial-misconduct pro-se-litigation sixth-circuit standing structural-error
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2020-01-24
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1) Did the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals abuse its discretion when it committed clear error of judgment, by relying on clearly erroneous findings of fact?
2) Did District Court Judge Aaron Dan Polster abuse his discretion/commit structural error when he openly admitted that he was a party (adverse party opponent) to the "proceedings," yet proceeded to preside over the "proceedings" anyway (In re Murchison, 340 U.S.133, 75 S.Ct.623, 99. L. Ed. 942 (1955)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals abuse its discretion when it committed clear error of judgment, by relying on clearly erroneous findings of fact?
Docket Entries
2020-01-27
Rehearing DENIED. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-01-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2019-11-18
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-11-12
Petition DENIED. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2019-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-10-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-03-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 6, 2019)
Attorneys
Lewis Brown
Lewis Brown — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent