No. 19-6174
David Anthony Lee v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process federal-law fourteenth-amendment fourteenth-amendment-rights habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment sixth-amendment-rights state-court-proceedings
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether Mr. Lee's conviction was obtained in violation of his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights of the United States Constitution.
2. Whether Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal:
(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States; or
(2) resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Mr. Lee's conviction was obtained in violation of his Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-12-05
Waiver of right of respondent Darrel Vannoy to respond filed.
2019-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-09-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 4, 2019)
Attorneys
Darrel Vannoy
Elizabeth Baker Murrill — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
David Lee
David Anthony Lee — Petitioner