1) In ruling that the statement that Judaism is a "doctrine of hate", with to "violence and murder" nothing more, is so equivalent that literature making such a statement may be banned from a federal prison pursuant to US ConstAmend I, did the Seventh Circuit err in siding with the Fifth and Sixth Circuits against the Second, Third, Eighth, and, Ninth, and, did the Seventh Circuit so far depart from the accept ed and usual course of judicial proceedings in its interpretation of of US Const Amend I to call for an exercise of this Court ...visory power?s super-i

Whether the Seventh Circuit erred in ruling that the statement that Judaism is a 'doctrine of hate' is equivalent to 'violence and murder' such that literature making such a statement may be banned from a federal prison pursuant to the First Amendment, in conflict with other circuits