No. 19-6143
Christopher Scott v. Gene Beasley, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitution-framing constitutional-law due-process exoneration judicial-review original-intent separation-of-powers standing statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2019-11-08
Question Presented (from Petition)
DID THE FRAMER! Si OF THE CONSTITUTION BELIEVE THAT THE DOCUMENT'S
POWER WOULD "EXONERATE?! [A] MAN ?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the framers of the Constitution believe that the document's power would 'exonerate' a man?
Docket Entries
2019-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-10-15
Waiver of right of respondent Gene Beasley, Warden to respond filed.
2019-09-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 4, 2019)
Attorneys
Christopher Scott
Christopher Scott — Petitioner
Gene Beasley, Warden
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent