No. 19-6121

In Re Matthew Lee Staszak

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2019-10-02
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-violations cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel mandamus prosecutorial-misconduct
Latest Conference: 2020-01-24 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

SHOULD THIS SUPREME COURT ISSUE THE WRIT OF MANDAMUS
TO THE LOWER U.S. DISTRICT COURT IN ORDER TO COMPEL THE DISTRICT
COURT TO EXERCISE ITS ARTICLE III POWERS AND ITS JURISDICTION
TO ADJUDICATE PETITIONER'S 28 USC § 2255 HABEAS CORPUS PETITION
IN A TIMELY MANNER, THUS TO SUMMARILY HEAR AND DETERMINE THE
FACTS, AND DISPOSE OF THE MATTER AS LAW AND JUSTICE REQUIRED
OF PETITIONER'S NUMEROUS GROUNDS OF INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF
COUNSEL, DUE PROCESS VIOLATIONS, PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT,
ADDITIONAL CLAIMS OF CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS, AND WHERE
ANY DELAY IN ADJUDICATING PETITIONER'S 2255 CASE ON THE MERITS
VIOLATES, INTER ALIA, HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS
AND HIS RIGHT AGAINST CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should this Supreme Court issue the writ of mandamus to compel the district court to adjudicate petitioner's 28 USC § 2255 habeas corpus petition

Docket Entries

2020-01-27
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-01-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020.
2019-12-03
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-11-12
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/8/2019.
2019-10-15
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-09-17
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due November 1, 2019)

Attorneys

Matthew Lee Staszak
Matthew L. Staszak — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent