No. 19-6112
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: all-writs-act appellate-review breach-of-fiduciary-duty civil-rights due-process fiduciary-duty fraud intentional-infliction-of-emotional-distress legal-malpractice mandamus-remedy pro-se-plaintiff rooker-feldman-doctrine stay-on-state-judgment writ-of-mandamus
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in dismissing the petitioner's state law claims against the defendants for legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, and intentional infliction of emotional distress
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-10-23
Waiver of right of respondents Jason L. Solotaroff, Esq.; Darnley Stewart, Esq.; and Giskan, Solotaroff, Anderson and Steward, LLP to respond filed.
2019-06-11
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 31, 2019)
Attorneys
Jason L. Solotaroff, Esq.; Darnley Stewart, Esq.; and Giskan, Solotaroff, Anderson and Steward, LLP
Ian Marc Herman — Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker, LLP, Respondent
Larry Pouncy
Larry Pouncy — Petitioner