No. 19-6097
Clarence Duke Reynolds v. Virginia, et al.
IFP
Tags: administrative-law appointment-clause constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection hearing-procedure parole parole-board selection-process separation-of-powers standing statutory-interpretation victim-impact
Latest Conference:
2019-12-06
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is §53.1-134, the law used for the selection of parole board members, unconstitutional?
Is the Virginia Parole Board Manual that mandates the use of the "Present Offense" as part of the decision-making for parole eligibility unconstitutidal,?.!
Is petitioner being denied his constitutional right to a neutral and deteached hearing when sitting members of the parole board are a victim of crime or member of a crime victim's organization?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is §53.1-134, the law used for the selection of parole board members, unconstitutional?
Docket Entries
2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-09-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 30, 2019)
Attorneys
Clarence Duke Reynolds
Clarence Duke Reynolds — Petitioner