No. 19-6091

James L. Toney v. Heath Dickson, et al.

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-10-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-review cover-up discovery due-process evidence fair-trial federal-habeas habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance marshals ncic procedural-default standing state-court-review
Latest Conference: 2019-12-06
Question Presented (from Petition)

1.Why th cse as fidand it tms from201 nt 2017
2. To Keep fming the
of cheating the State of Arkansas
Cheating Scandle and the
the Government for: CollegeDegree
ScandBT
College Edmission Cheating
To: Get the three strike Dismissal Taetic seeEXHIBIT (R)in the pack
3
4. Compare both.cses nothingsimilari Case:/9-/273 andCase:19-1059
Case 19-/273 Executing an rrest warrant that camethrough the NCIC
system two diffrent Ferderalcourt systems, that story was used it
Lie not ConTruE, SeE I EXHIBIT C,D)
verification from FBI
was a
all Feckral Cortssee EXHIBIT(B).

an Attorney buti am secing all the trick's now.
6 I was
%. To summarize Heath Dickson avoided being exposed
a suspet anothr by Dickon Arey the suspect tht the nveat
See in Jugement Document 7

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the exposure of cheating by the State of Arkansas and the concomitant collusion to cover up cheating evidence violates due process and the right to a fair trial

Docket Entries

2019-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2019-11-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2019.
2019-09-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 31, 2019)

Attorneys

James L. Toney
James L. Toney — Petitioner