1. Is California's Domestic Violence Prevention Act's (DVPA's) severable residual clause defining "abuse" (Family Code (F.C.) § 6203(a)(4)) unconstitutional as overbroad, void for vagueness and/or in violation of separation of powers?

2. Do Molinaro v. Molinaro, 33 Cal.App.5th 824 (2019), In Re Marriage of Nadkarni, 173 Cal.App.4th 1483 and cases holding that "disturbing the peace" means "destroying the mental or emotional calm" of a party form an unconstitutional California exception to First Amendment jurisprudence that violates Federal Supremacy and that conflicts with other appellate opinions?

3. Does the State of California have a public policy interest in preventing divorcing parents from discussing their divorce with their children sufficient to support a content-based restriction on free speech?

Is California's Domestic Violence Prevention Act's (DVPA's) severable residual clause defining 'abuse' (Family Code (F.C.) § 6203(a)(4)) unconstitutional as overbroad, void for vagueness and/or in violation of separation of powers?