Guillermo Vega-Botello v. United States
Whether a court of appeals that finds a plain error in the district court's selection of a statutory maximum should ordinarily order a limited remand for the sole purpose of determining whether this error affected substantial rights, and, if not, whether it should affirm if the district court does not mention the statutory range in its sentencing commentary?
Whether a court of appeals that finds a plain error in the district court's selection of a statutory maximum should ordinarily order a limited remand for the sole purpose of determining whether this error affected substantial rights, and, if not, whether it should affirm if the district court does not mention the statutory range in its sentencing commentary?