Gerald Nelson v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1181-1061, AFL-CIO, et al.
1. Complete-Preemption Doctrine refers to a rule that a federal statue's preemptive force may be so extraordinary and all-encompassing that it converts an ordinary state-common-law complaint into one stating a federal claim for purposes of the well-pleaded-complaint rule. Question presented can United States Court of Appeal and District Federal Court, sua sponte a case when plaintiff has not had a chance to file a complaint and respondent have not presented a federal question ?
2. Subject-matter jurisdiction is the authority of a court to hear cases of a particular type or cases relating to a specific subject matter. Question presented is does State Court have Jurisdiction when a case is removed to federal Court with a summon and notice .or does Federal District Court lack Subject-matter jurisdiction because a complaint has not been served ?
3. Does a Federal Court violate the Fourteenth Amendment when plaintiff is
Whether the United States Court of Appeal and District Federal Court can sua sponte a case when plaintiff has not had a chance to file a complaint and respondent have not presented a federal question