No. 19-6058
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: case-analysis civil-procedure-standing constitutional-law criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process extradition international-law judicial-interpretation legal-precedent res-judicata standing
Latest Conference:
2020-02-21
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether This Court's Conclusions in United States v. Rauscher, 119 U.S. 407 (1886), in Conjunction with W.S. Kirkpatrick & Co., Inc. v. Environmental Tectonics Corp., 494 U.S. 790 (1990), Apply in Petitioner's Case.
2. Whether This Court's Conclusions in NFL v. Lockhart, 979 U.S. 1 (1988), in Conjunction with Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972), Apply in Petitioner's Case.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court's conclusions in United States v. Rauscher, 119 U.S. 407 (1886) in conjunction with Kirkpatrick & Co., Inc. v. Environmental Tectonics Corp., Int'l, 493 U.S. 400 (1990), apply in petitioner's case
Docket Entries
2020-02-24
Rehearing DENIED.
2020-02-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.
2019-11-25
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-11-04
Petition DENIED.
2019-10-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
2019-10-02
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-09-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 25, 2019)
Attorneys
Guy Philippe
Guy Phillippe — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent